The original toomeys were sold by his brother. These are supposed to be the same performance wise
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Webber on January 03, 2024, 08:10:16 PMThanks a ton for all the input, went down the cpi big bore rabbit hole, TZ, etc. As it stand I'm leaning towards this:
Cylinders: Webike LC jugs (Nikasil is nice to see)
LC set up TBD
Exhaust: Tyga or JL
Clutch: TBD
Carbs: Still mulling over the idea of smart or lectron even knowing the potential top end loss and ridiculous price. Dug into 2-1 like the banshees run. Pretty hard to find upsides with that set up haha.
Ignition: Vape with Zeel
Quote from: SoCal250 on December 06, 2023, 12:27:49 PMI think part of the reason it's overbid is because bidders may be under the impression it has a Calif title, which it doesn't seem to. There is an error in the listing. I have tried to point this out on the Iconic site but my comment from 2 days ago never appeared and is in "pending" limbo status.
I think the winning bidder might get a big surprise if they're expecting to register it in CA.
Quote from: This Old Daytona on December 06, 2023, 02:44:02 AMOkay, basic question. Are US Daytona RD400F swingarms different than a standard RD?
Jeeeez if that Metachex swinger ain't awesome. But I also liked the middle one above w the nice axle adjusters..sadly it seems there ling gone☹️
As nother quick question... I have boxes of old RZ parts I know the fork tubes are interchangeable at 35 what about the rear swing arm I don't really care if it's steel or not if it's " free". Lol I easily can adapt it for twin shocks.
I'm not up to date on the specific differences from the Daytona "F" vs 76-78 RDs
Thanks for any reply, it's appreciated.
Page created in 0.436 seconds with 21 queries.